This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The compliance challenges of virtual IBANs, focusing on AML obligations and regulatory gaps. However, their rapid adoption has raised concerns about regulatory oversight, particularly concerning anti-money laundering (AML) compliance. Why is it important?
Limit access to sensitive accounts payable information to maintain security. Establish internal controls to ensure compliance and prevent fraud. Tracking metrics and key performance indicators (KPIs) along the way allows businesses to measure the effectiveness of their accounts payable function and make data-driven decisions.
These businesses face stricter scrutiny during merchant underwriting as payment processors aim to minimize economic and compliance risks. Regulatory complianceCompliance with industry-specific regulations is mandatory for all businesses seeking to process electronic payments.
Differentiator 1: Payment Aggregation The most crucial distinguishing factor of PayFacs is that they operate as merchants themselves and register for processing accounts directly with an acquiring bank. They are then able to onboard and aggregate sub-merchant accounts under their masteraccount.
Additionally, PayFacs can offer merchants a much simpler account onboarding process. When PayFacs utilize automated underwriting tools, they are able to instantly onboard clients under their masteraccount through a convenient online onboarding process.
And while Google and Facebook can act as the auto-repositories for all passwords —solving part of the problem — it does create the small issue that if someone should gain access to or control of those masteraccounts, they have “the keys to the kingdom,” according to Maloney.
Many banks have been hesitant to engage with these businesses, citing concerns over compliance burdens, anti-money laundering (AML) obligations, and the inherent volatility of digital assets. One notable change is the removal of “reputational risk” as a consideration when evaluating applications for masteraccounts.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content