This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The tension between the desire of government agencies to gain more access with greater ease, and the public’s evolving perception of data privacy rights, is ongoing and writ large in the case of FBI vs. Apple, which brings the complexities regarding security technology such as encryption to light.
The head of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Director James Comey, said on Wednesday (May 11) that more litigation looms over devices that are mobile and consumer-oriented and that encryption remains a form of “essential tradecraft” among terrorist groups, as reported by Reuters.
Apple’s encryption battle against the FBI may have simmered down, but Apple is not backing down on further bolstering the security of its devices. In his time at Apple, Callas built an encryption system to safeguard data stored on Mac computers. Callas’ appointment comes just weeks after the FBI spent $1.34
A media outlet in Israel is reporting that an Israeli company has been tasked with helping the FBI gain access into the iPhone owned by one of the shooters in last year’s San Bernardino shooting. As the FBI continued to conduct its own research and as a result of the worldwide publicity and attention on this case, others outside the U.S.
The Apple-FBIencryption saga appears to be tempered — for now — but the debate about what role the federal government has on the subject is just getting started. And then, of course, there’s the debate going on over privacy and civil liberties. But for now, the debate continues.
In order to access the San Bernardino terrorist’s locked iPhone, the FBI reportedly called on the help of professional hackers. Sources explained that the researchers who helped the FBI specialize in exposing security vulnerabilities in software and were paid a one-time flat fee for their services.
29) that could set precedent for the company’s ongoing battle with the FBI in the San Bernardino iPhone case. And similar to the current case that’s causing so much controversy in the political and tech worlds, Apple pitched consumer privacy as the reason to not extract data from the iPhone.
FBI Director James Comey discussed cybersecurity issues at a Boston College cybersecurity conference this week, highlighting that Americans should let go of their expectations of “absolute privacy.”. There is no such thing as absolute privacy in America; there is no place outside of judicial reach,” Comey made clear to the crowd.
The Apple-FBI saga continues with more tech industry execs weighing in on what they think Apple should be doing. I personally want to see this case in front of the FBI with every bit of evidence so that they have access to whatever information they need to make sure my kids are safe.”.
FBI Director James Comey confirmed on Thursday (April 21) that the agency spent more than his salary over the next seven year and four month in order to gain access into the encrypted iPhone of one of the San Bernardino shooters, Reuters reported. million over the remainder of his job — figures from both the FBI and the U.S.
Although the company may have won this round, recent updates to Apple’s security protocols and new roles within its corporate structure suggest that it may be building up a defense against future government requests, which Apple claims would put the privacy of all of its users at risk.
Department of Justice on Thursday (March 3) that they were aware of “numerous instances” in which criminals had switched to iPhones from “burner” phones to conduct illegal activity, in large part citing the phone’s operating system’s encryption features as a prime benefit in evading police detection and surveillance.
Securing identity should be at top of mind — all, of course, while keeping consumer privacy in mind. We need both – we need security and we need privacy,” Alexander said during a debate that ensued about the Apple vs. FBIencryption security debate.
Interpol is coming out against strong encryption, saying it protects child sex predators. Tech companies should include mechanisms in the design of their encrypted products and services whereby governments, acting with appropriate legal authority, can obtain access to data in a readable and useable format.”. The idea that the U.S.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content